Altex Corporation case study, management homework

Altex Corporation

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Need an answer from similar question? You have just landed to the most confidential, trustful essay writing service to order the paper from.
Place an order at payessaywriter.com for guaranteed high grades.
Order Now

Read Case 3: Altex Corporation in the case study section of your text. Write a summary of the case and answer the following questions from the end of the case. 

  • Why was a risk management plan considered unnecessary?
  • Should risk management planning be performed in the proposal stage or after contract award, assuming that it must be done?
  • Does the customer have the right to expect the contractor to perform risk analysis and develop a risk management plan if it is not called out as part of the contractual statement of work?
  • Would Altex have been more interested in developing a risk management plan if the project were funded entirely from within?
  • How might the Army have responded if they were presented with a risk management plan early during the R&D activities?
  • Can risk management planning be justified on almost all programs and projects?

Your paper must be 2-4 pages in length (not including title and reference pages), doubled spaced, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved style guide.  A minimum of two sources, including the text, must be used to complete this assignment.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Please follow grading rubrics/pdf case study below

——————————————————————————————————————————————

Description:

Total Possible Score: 5.00

Summarize the Case Study

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Exceptionally clear and concise summary of the case study.

Proficient – Adequately summarizes the case study.  A few minor details have not been included.

Basic – A summary of the case study is provided; however, important and relevant details have been omitted.

Below Expectations – Attempts to summarize the case study, but not enough detail is provided.

Non-Performance – The summary of the case study is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Responses to Questions

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – All answers are accurate, clear, and precise. The answers are detailed, specific, and relevant to the question at hand. The answers consider different points of view, address complexities in the question when applicable, and incorporate a variety of perspectives.

Proficient – Most answers are accurate, clear, and precise.  Most answers are detailed, specific, and relevant to the question at hand. Most of the answers consider different points of view, address complexities in the question when applicable, and incorporate a variety of perspectives.

Basic – Some answers are accurate, clear, and precise. Some answers are detailed, specific, and relevant to the question at hand. Some of the answers consider different points of view, address complexities in the question when applicable, and incorporate a variety of perspectives.

Below Expectations – A few answers are accurate, clear, and precise. A few answers are detailed, specific, and relevant to the question at hand. A few of the answers consider different points of view, address complexities in the question when applicable, and incorporate a variety of perspectives.

Non-Performance – None of the answers are accurate, clear, or precise. No answers consider different points of view, address complexities in the question when applicable, or incorporate a variety of perspectives.

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 0.20

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.

Proficient – Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.20

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA Formatting

Total: 0.20

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper; however, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper.  Layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting.  There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Page Requirement

Total: 0.20

Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirements predetermined in the assignment description.

Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement.

Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Resource Requirement

Total: 0.20

Distinguished – Provides ample resources and uses the correct amount of sources from the specified search agent.

Proficient – Provides the approximate number of sources, while using some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment instructions.

Basic – Provides over half of the  sources required in the assignment instructions.

Below Expectations – Barely provides adequate resources and unable to include sources from specified search agent.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

page_1_altex_case_study.pdf

page_2_altex_case_study.pdf

page_3_altex_case_study.pdf